ipIterPrompt

Critique Session Facilitation — Healthcare App

Run a critique session that produces useful feedback instead of opinions. Purpose-built for healthcare app contexts.

iterpromptUpdated 2026-07-171,792 copies

A structured designer prompt for design critique & feedback: run a critique session that produces useful feedback instead of opinions, tailored to a health product used under stress where mistakes have consequences. It walks the model through a proven process with an explicit quality bar, and delivers a facilitation plan.

The prompt

Variables to fill in: {{design_description}}{{goals}}{{stage}}

You are a design director who gives critique that makes the work better and the designer stronger. I need your help in the context of a health product used under stress where mistakes have consequences.

TASK: Run a critique session that produces useful feedback instead of opinions.

DELIVERABLE: Produce a facilitation plan: the framing the presenter gives, feedback rules with examples, the round structure, capture format, and how to handle the loudest-voice problem.

PROCESS:
1. Review the inputs below. If anything critical is missing or ambiguous, ask me up to three clarifying questions before producing the deliverable.
2. Judge against the design's own goals from the inputs — critique without stated goals is just taste.
3. Order feedback by user impact: what breaks the experience, what weakens it, what polishes it.
4. For every issue, name the principle at stake and suggest a direction — not the pixel-level fix.
5. Produce the deliverable in a clean, skimmable format I can use directly.

QUALITY BAR:
- Specific and observable: 'the CTA competes with the nav' not 'feels busy'.
- Strengths are named with the same rigor as problems — designers need to know what to keep.
- Distinguishes 'this violates a principle' from 'I would have done it differently'.

INPUTS:
- The design: describe the screens/flow, or paste the spec/copy: {{design_description}}
- What this design is supposed to achieve and for whom: {{goals}}
- How far along: early concept, refined, pre-ship: {{stage}}

Run this prompt on a real model without leaving the page. Every run is saved to your history for this prompt.

Fill in the variables

How to use

  1. 1Fill in the {{design_description}}, {{goals}}, {{stage}} variables with your real details — specifics in, specifics out.
  2. 2Paste the prompt into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, or any capable model.
  3. 3Answer the clarifying questions it asks; that step is what makes the output fit your situation.
  4. 4Iterate on the deliverable: ask for alternatives, tighter versions, or a different angle on any section.

Pro tips

  • If the output feels generic, add more concrete detail to the inputs — names, numbers, and constraints sharpen everything.
  • Works well in a thread: keep the conversation going to refine a facilitation plan.

Related

Rapid Prototyper Agent Role

Turn any AI chat into a rapid prototyper agent role with this community persona prompt.

3,949 copiesOpen ↗

Structured Design Critique — Data Visualization

Critique a design against its goals rigorously. Purpose-built for data visualization contexts.

3,468 copiesOpen ↗

Structured Design Critique — Mobile App

Critique a design against its goals rigorously. Purpose-built for mobile app contexts.

3,868 copiesOpen ↗

Portfolio Case Study Review — E-commerce Store

Review a design case study for how well it demonstrates judgment. Purpose-built for e-commerce store contexts.

3,896 copiesOpen ↗